Stupid Netscape So I’m going along, all happy and designing the DC Dark Side page and all, really pleased with the way the site’s turning out, when I think to myself “hey, what’s this look like under Netscape?”
Shit.
I really really really don’t like Netscape. I used to swear by the thing and now I can’t stand it. As a websurfer and designer, the browser does nothing for me, not when Internet Explorer opens faster, loads pages faster and is actually CODED TO STANDARD!!!!
Okay, so Netscape 6 meets standard requirements, great, but the browser’s still freakin huge and kills any computer more than two years old (at least, any computer I’ve played with it on). And I know the standard thing isn’t completely NS’s fault. I mean, way back when, NS was THE standard because there was nothing else. IE came out and slowly but surely dug into their market. NS went on with business as usual, they were the industry leader, they set the standard. When IE started to do their own thing, NS refused to follow, either ignoring what IE did or coming up with their own code for the same thing (like IFRAMES and ILAYERS). But, as IE grew, it pushed itself into the spotlight and it’s code into standard. NS continued in it’s own little world until it broke down and conformed, for the most part, with NS6.
But most folks, if they use NS, still use NS4. 6 is a beast of a browser (or what when i first used it, it screwed up so many times I gave up on it and have no idea how the more recent versions are). So, most NS folks aren’t browsing to standard.
So, then we come to the question that crosses the mind of most webmonkeys:
Do you design a site so everyone can see it or do you design to standard?
I think one site put it as “back designing” and “forward designing”.
Now, I’m usually one for cross browser compatability, though I’ve kinda slacked on that as of late. Most of the pages I’ve designed in the past year have been made with IE in mind. Hell, it took NS users to point out that HEROES originally looked crappy in NS (though that was more from my poor programming than standard issues). But JSKOnline, the redesign I recently scrapped for J’s Notes, and now Dark Side all are made for IE. Part of this is I program at work when I’m bored, they only have IE here, but another part is I’m finding all sorts of neat toys to play with (DHTML, CSS) that just don’t work in anything before NS6.
So, do I conform and sacrifice design for the sake of the viewers or do I force the viewers to conform for the sake of my design?
Well, since Dark Side isn’t my baby, I put the ball back in the site editor’s court and I’ll let him decide, but with JSKOnline and any other personal designs, uh-uh, you conform to standards baby. Now, JSKOnline works in NS4, but it doesn’t look as pretty, the alignment’s weird and all that. But, if you want to see it all kick ass like, get IE5 (or better) or NS6. The whole point of the site is to show off and play with design. Yeah, yeah, I’m not showing off on NS, but I’m showing off overall.
For sites like my brother’s political one (shaunkenney.com) and HEROES and anything else with a broad base readership and that’s just more about content than actual design, I’ll worry about NS and all the other non-standard things out there.
It all comes down to the purpose of the site. Am I trying to get folks to appreciate the site visually or for it’s content? I’ll go from there.
Until then, please, for the love of got, get standard. Either use Internet Explorer or get Netscape 6 (and if that’s good, please let me know, I may break down and download it just to play with it).
Okay, I’m done.
NOTE: my representation of browser history may be horribly wrong, but it’s the way I saw things happen and what not. Don’t kill me, please correct me. Go standard!