Moussaoui: Lawyers Are Conspiring
A man accused of conspiracy to commit terrorism in connection with the Sept. 11 attacks declared in court Monday that he was ending cooperation with his court-appointed lawyers and said he prayed to Allah for the destruction of the United States and Israel.
A hearing on Zacarias Moussaoui’s conditions of imprisonment took a sudden turn when Moussaoui, who could face the death penalty, raised his hand at the outset and said the government and his attorneys were part of a plan to execute him.
“It’s a sophisticated version of the kiss of death,” Moussaoui, speaking at the lawyer’s podium, told U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema.
“The United States will not have a trial without me,” he said. “They only need me for the gas chamber.”
Oof.
And he may not be completely wrong. I mean, think about it. Look at the total hysteria still around from September 11th and how an attorney attempting to defend someone who most of America has already deemed guilty might be under a wee bit of pressure, publically and professionally, to act a certain way. One that might not be what is best for his client. It’s unfortunate, but that’s what’s happened. Innocent until proven guilty is completely out the window, gone, kaput, the Bush administration saw to that when they detained THOUSANDS of Arabs and Arab Americans for no more reason than that they were Arab.
And win or loose, Maussaoui’s out of America. He can’t stay here, not if he wants to live, the public have found him guilty and if a court finds otherwise, the public will have their way with him. Sad, really.
And THIS pisses me off!
How damn short sighted can you be? Now, I’m about to go off on a rant here, not about Israel, but about Iraq and the Gulf War.
Ahem.
WE COULD NOT SAFELY REMOVE SADDAM FROM POWER IN 1991!!!!!
Now for the reasons.
Who would have replace him? There was no strong successor in place, the government would have been in shambles. Sure, we could let the Kurds fight for it, but they hardly represent the Iraqi people, living primarily in the north and only being a small percentage of the overall population. That and the fact that Turkey hates them too (but, of course, they’re NATO so we forgive them of any problems there). The best they could do is break off, so, yea, you now have a balkanized Iraq that’s a bunch of weak states. And if that didn’t happen, and it all reamined one Iraq, you’d still have a government with no direction, no strong leader to show it the way. A puppet government supplied by us. Yea, nation building!
Then we’re looking at a permanant military presence in the middle east, and while we wouldn’t want that, we’d have no choice because as soon as we stepped away, the balance of power enters another court.
Iran.
Ah, yes, one third of the axis of evil would have held complete control over the middle east. Really. Iraq and Iran hate each other. Saddam is great for keeping Iran in check. They spend most of their time and resources keeping an eye on each other. That’s good. It keeps them from turning their full attention elsewhere, say, Israel or Afghanistan.
So everyone who’s out their bitching about how we should have finished the job ten years ago needs to stop and think a bit. No, I mean REALLY think. Screw this armchair pundit bullshit, I want you to do some reasearch, read up a bit, and realize that the best thing we could have done is what we did because the alternatives are a hell of a lot worse.
What can we do about it now? Not much, really. The Bush Administration is looking at attempting an Afghani style of campaign in Iran, fund the resistance and have them overthrow Saddam. Only, there’s one problem. Saddam has done a wonderful job of keeping any resistance weak and without a central leader. He had killed his own brother because he saw him as a threat. There is no one figure who can lead Iraq other than Saddam.
So what are we do to? Let’s bomb the hell out of him again. We need to remove his capacity to carry out any aggression on his neighbors and his ability to make and use chemical, biological or nuclear weapons. We also need to limit his ability to fund terrorist activities in other areas (West Bank). Then require him to allow not just UN inspectors, but NATO and Arab League inspectors into his country. It was our inability and unwillingness to force Saddam to accept the sanctions and inspections that has led to where we are now, not just that he’s still in power.
Unless the administration knows something I don’t and have a strong successor waiting.
I’m sure there’s a better long term solution, let me think on that more and I’ll rant again in the future.