This show is going to suck and if this person wins, I’m leaving the country.
Who Wants to Be the President?
It’s tempting to make fun of the idea as a cross between “Survivor” and C-SPAN, a frivolous sideshow to the presidential campaign.
Which is why it’s a tad disconcerting when executive producer R.J. Cutler insists that his let’s-do-a-show-about-picking-a-presidential-candidate idea will be good for democracy (and presumably ratings).
“People are going to see how hard it is and have a newfound appreciation for what this kind of journey is all about,” he says. “You’re going to see real leaders emerge.”
“American Candidate,” which debuts in January on Rupert Murdoch’s FX network, rides the reality-TV bandwagon by staging a competition to pick a faux presidential candidate. The wannabes — with no official announcement, 5,000 people have already written in — will be whittled down to 18 finalists, all but one of whom will be voted off the political island through phone and Internet polls.
And, really though, what kind of respectable candidate’s going to even try this? We’re gonna have crackpots and longshots doing this because anyone worth their salt knows this is a political dead end, especially when they lose…
NATO Breaks Monthlong Impasse on Defense Planning for Turkey
Wait, ‘monthlong impass’? Wasn’t it only two weeks?
Breaking a monthlong stalemate that saw its biggest rift since the Cold War, NATO ended an impasse over defensive actions in case of war in Iraq, reaffirming alliance solidarity while supporting U.N. efforts for a peaceful solution.
The agreement was reached after the alliance pulled an end-run around France.
For a month, France, Germany and Belgium blocked a U.S. proposal to begin planning to help defend Turkey from possible retaliatory attacks by Saddam Hussein in the event of another war in the Gulf. They argued such a move was premature and would undermine U.N. efforts to avoid war.
On Sunday, the 19-member alliance turned to its Defense Planning Committee, which Paris withdrew from in 1966, to negotiate an end to the NATO deadlock. Paris participates only in political consultations.
The committee was used before the 1991 war against Iraq to approve aid for Turkey. But NATO has sought to limit its use since the end of the Cold War in a spirit of rapprochement with Paris.
“Alliance solidarity has prevailed,” NATO Secretary-General Lord Robertson said in announcing the agreement late Sunday. “We have been able collectively to overcome the impasse.”
With France sidelined, Germany dropped its objections and Belgium followed hours later.
“We would have preferred to have a decision … with all 19 members present,” Robertson said. “France believed that these measures were not yet opportune. But I hope that people will not in any way get a signal that it implies any less commitment” to Turkey’s defense.
I’ll link to it, but I still hate FoxNews. That and the Washington Times always comes across to me sounding like a tabloid. “The alliance pulled an end run around France.” This could have been said without saying that. Hell, look at the context of the rest of the story! Is this simply an effort of slant or stating something about their target audience’s intellegence? I’d be insulted.
Guitar thief tried to serenade prostitutes
An alleged guitar thief has been caught in Germany after trying to serenade a group of prostitutes with the stolen instrument.
The electronic guitar, worth about £650, was reported stolen by a band after a late night performance at a Nuremberg hotel.
Police say one of their patrol teams later noticed a man standing in the street with a guitar.
He was trying to play a tune to some local prostitutes, but failed to make himself heard as he didn’t have an amplifier.
Police have returned the instrument to its owner. The suspect, a 24-year-old student, is facing theft charges.
Lawsuit Challenges Bush on War With Iraq
Six House members, members of the military and parents of servicemen went to federal court Thursday to try to prevent the president from launching an invasion of Iraq without an explicit declaration of war from Congress.
Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., and the other plaintiffs said the October 2002 congressional resolution backing military action against Iraq did not specifically declare war and unlawfully ceded the decision to President Bush.
Conyers cited the passage from the U.S. Constitution that states, “Congress shall have power … to declare war.”
“Get it? Only Congress,” Conyers said at a news conference in Washington.
…
“I would imagine that they’re aware the lawsuit is a very long shot, an extremely long shot,” said Taylor Reveley, dean of the William and Mary School of Law and author of the book “War Powers of the President and Congress: Who Holds the Arrows and Olive Branch?”
“But they’re probably interested in doing anything they can to throw sand in the wheels of American military action in Iraq.”
Reveley said majorities in both houses of Congress approving a resolution authorizing military action ? as the House and Senate did in October ? would pass constitutional muster and provide wide presidential discretion.
The congressional resolution states: “This joint resolution may be cited as the `Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq.’”
Congress has not formally declared a war since World War II. The War Powers Act, passed in 1973 in response to the Vietnam War and the actions of President Nixon, requires the president to seek congressional approval before or shortly after ordering military action abroad. It also requires the president to report to Congress.
Why is it that ever time Conyers opens his mouth I get pissed off? As was said above, the joint resolution is all the President needs for authorization. This was a sticking point when it was passed but didn’t stop it. The Dems conceeded then, you can’t expect to turn around now, especially with Republicans in control of everything. Congress already approved it. Sorrry.
Belgium Doesn’t Exist!
For too long we have been told lies.
The existence of the supposed European country of Belgium has been taken as gospel for years by members of the Liberati. It has long been held up as a shining example of Liberal philosophies in action. However, now is the time the truth be known. Belgium doesn’t exist.
Belgium is, and has always been, a leftist ruse; a device applied to propagate the Liberal agenda throughout the world. Hijacking a real country for this use would be difficult at best; the people living there wouldn’t stand for it (i.e. the fall of communism.) Thus the idea to invent an imaginary country, insert it into the global consciousness through the perversion of history, and use it as a tool of manipulation was born.
I never knew!