The Other Side of the Debate and other nutty things.
Pentagon Threatens to Kill Independent Reporters In Iraq
Kate Adie: “The Americans… and I’ve been talking to the Pentagon …take the attitude which is entirely hostile to the free spread of information.”
” I was told by a senior officer in the Pentagon, that if uplinks –that is the television signals out of… Bhagdad, for example– were detected by any planes …electronic media… mediums, of the military above Bhagdad… they’d be fired down on. Even if they were journalists ..’ Who cares! ‘ said.. [inaudible] ..”
Tom McGurk: “…Kate …sorry Kate ..just to underline that. Sorry to interrupt you. Just to explain for our listeners. Uplinks is where you have your own satellite telephone method of distributing information.”
Kate Adie: ” The telephones and the television signals.”
Tom McGurk: ” And they would be fired on? ”
Kate Adie: ” Yes. They would be ‘targeted down,’ said the officer.”
Tom McGurk: ” Extraordinary ! ”
Yes, wow, how extraordinary that the US would target unidentified communication signals inside a country they are attacking. My, I mean, it’s not like the Iraqi miliary would be using such technology.
US Readies Nuke Option as WW3 Erupts in Serbia
The assassination of the Serbian Prime Minister Zoran Djindjic marks a grave deterioration in international relations over US plans for a Gulf invasion. Meanwhile, the testing of a high power bomb by the US is a smokescreen for its preparedness to use theater nuclear weapons in the forthcoming conflict.
NATO political gains in Eastern Europe were in disarray today after the murder of the Serbian Prime Minister Djindjic. The killing is clearly the opening of a second front in the international power struggle currently centered on the Gulf region.
Clearly. Cause, you know, this had nothing to do with political infighting dealing with a Prime Minister who turned over a popular former Serbian president to the War Crimes Tribunal and EVERYTHING to do with the middle east. Yep.
And NATO gains “in disarray“? The article linked to is about no clear line of succession, not NATO’s plans in Eastern Europe, which are not limited to Serbia. If anything, the assassination simply marks the continuation of a cycle of violence that has surrounded the Balkans for centuries.
Anyways, let’s continue with this ‘Nuke Option’ article.
Underneath the veneer of civilized debate at the United Nations, the world has just lurched sharply towards World War III.
“Europe has lost a friend… who fought hard for democracy,” an EU statement said. But, Europe lost more than a friend and ally, it just lost the plot. Djinjic was the West’s man in Serbia, and it was he who handed over Yugoslavia’s former leader, Slobodan Milosevic to Western justice. His murder is eerily reminiscent of the killing of Franz Ferdinand, who was assassinated by a Serbian nationalist in Sarajevo in June 1914. The assassination precipitated a crisis which led to the outbreak of World War I.
Yes, let us ignore the whole political situations not only surrounding that assassination, but the mood in Europe and alliances at the time. Ferdinand was Archduke as appointed by the Hasburg empire’s remains in Austria-Hungary, an empire seen as ruling over the Serbian people who wanted to be free from the Hasburg empire. The assassination was a continuation of their struggle against this government. Austria-Hungary was allied with Germany while Russia supported Serbia and France and England tried to talk some peace into the situation. Germany’s efforts to delay the Austrian government from an invasion as to not provoke a Russian advance proved to be the cause of the war because Austria’s delay created the sense that their attack was almost unprovoked. Anyways, that part being neither here nor there, the circumstances surrounding the assassination were quite different than those around Djindjic’s in that the Prime Minister’s assassination can be seen as more of an internal struggle than that of international politics.
Even before the Serbian killing, the US test of a high power Massive Ordnance Air Blast, or MOAB bomb in Florida, was a clear sign it is readying the nuclear option in the coming Gulf conflict. Although the 21,000 bomb used conventional munitions, it was universally described in Western media as having an explosion signature indistinguishable from a nuclear weapon mushroom cloud. That emphasis achieved two purposes:
For US public consumption, it served as convenient cover should such bomb signatures be detected as a result of the use of theater nuclear weapons in the Gulf conflict. The widely publicized bomb test allows these to be dismissed as MOAB effects. An unconvincing cover, as in fact the signature was nothing like a nuclear mushroom –but a cover nonetheless.
Actually, signatures from a nuclear explosion are quite distinct from any other by not only, oh, what’s it called, RADIATION but also an electro magnetic pulse, which the MOAB cause neither of. The mushroom cloud is simply the result of a huge ass explosion and has simply been associated with a nuclear explosion because, at the time, that was the biggest ass explosion of them all and quite possibly still is.
For international geopolitical elite consumption, the “mushroom” references were a clear sign to US enemies, that faced with possible conflicts on multiple fronts, the US will not risk depleting it’s forces and resources in protracted battle in any individual region, but will seek quick victories by means of battlefield nuclear weapons.
Indeed, comments by Donald Rumsfeld that Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein might use chemical weapons on his own people was a sign that the US is prepared to use such weapons itself.
“His regime may be planning to use weapons of mass destruction against its own citizens, and then blame coalition forces,” Mr. Rumsfeld said. Given the little publicized US chemical warfare capabilities, that comment is more than a little disingenuous.
Oh yeah, I forgot, anything Saddam does to his people is really just a cover for what we did. We’re gonna slaughter the whole country with our weapons and stuff and say Saddam did it. And because we said he would, everyone will believe us, right? Yeah, especially with journalists all through the country. Oh, wait, no, the only journalists in the country will be those state run deals like CNN and FoxNews and stuff and they don’t show anything the government doesn’t want us to see. Nope. Too bad the military’s gonna kill off all those indie guys, now we’ll never know the truth.
I’m sorry, was that a bit much?
UN - Secretary-General Clinton?
Once again the future of Bill Clinton has become a hot topic that rivals ? or perhaps supplements ? “Plan Hillary,” which now is being massaged by New York’s junior senator. Keeping his plans as secret as the flight plan of a stealth bomber, Bill has been scheming to prepare his next leap into the spotlight.
Quite often when a bad situation is allowed to continue in the hope that it will go away, it just gets worse; and what he now is planning is beyond worse ? it is outrageous. With war in Iraq, weapons inspectors, meetings of the U.N. Security Council, conflicts between one-time allies and a new emergency every day or two, most of us are concentrated on the events of the day or even the hour.
Yet there is a need to lift our eyes from the clock and look at the calendar. Early in the fall, some seven months from now, the U.N. General Assembly may select a new secretary-general. Kofi Annan is under pressure to resign before the end of his second term in 2006. If he does, the General Assembly, on the recommendation of the U.N. Security Council, will approve a replacement.
COULD IT BE?
Over the years, there have been secretaries-general from Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa, but never from North America. Add to that fact the interesting detail that the U.N.’s towering Secretariat Building on Turtle Bay (First Avenue and 42nd Street to New Yorkers) is more than 50 years old, crumbling and is overdue for rebuilding. That takes money ? the kind of money only the long-suffering U.S. taxpayer can give, plus a cash-grabbing fund-raiser.
Add one more fascinating fact: a well-known (notorious to most of us) American is looking for the secretary-general’s job ? William Jefferson Clinton.
While it is still early, there is a major international move under way to make Bill Clinton the chief executive of the United Nations. Unbelievable? You had only to watch Clinton’s performance on a recent “Larry King Live” program. There, Bill, with his new haircut and coiffure blued to a snowy-white perfection, made repeated adulatory references to the United Nations.
Not because the UN is in the news. Nope, he’s obviously up to something. Oh, Bill.
Breakway march storms World Bank
As part of one of the breakaway marches during today’s demonstrations against the war, a group of 25-30 anarchists stormed the World Bank building. They ran through the building, spraypainting slogans and knocking over statues. Most of the group escaped out the back door.
There were six people arrested at the World Bank. One or two are juveniles. The arrestees are being held at the First and Second District precincts.
Yeah, way to get your message across, morons. Someone who was involved in the anti-war protest made a damn good post:
So let me get this straight… you’re patting yourself on the back for getting away with rushing into the World Bank, spray painting slogans, and knocking down art?
Maybe the World Bank wasn’t wildly difficult to get in (most days it really isn’t) because the World Bank and global capitalism wasn’t seen as the purpose of the protest march. Sure it’s related… but name a significant activist issue that isn’t related to war. The World Bank probably wasn’t thinking it was a likely target for civil disobedience but it shouldn’t have been.
As a participant in the peaceful march, I’m glad this “splinter group” hasn’t gotten much coverage. It’s an embarassing example of using meaningful social protest as a cover for carrying out petty acts of teenage-boy violence. (And no, you don’t have to be a teenage boy to be sadly engaged in teenage boy violence…)
Again, as a participant in the march, I wish Indymedia didn’t link story to the mainstream march feature. The vast majority of people who gathered for the march didn’t do so with any intention that it would somehow be used to legitimate or help publicize these acts of petty property violence.
Yep, have to agree, way to trivialize your movement, guys. I hope they arrest everyone of you. And I don’t want to hear any “they didnt’ tell us to disperse” bullshit either.
Pictures!

Bigger is Better?Size Does Matter

Cause, you know, this has everything to do with the war in Iraq.

Crap, busted!

Let’s see, one, two, three, ah, hell, there are eight people in that picture. Eights of thousands! And what the hell are you protesting here? The number of people against the war? The vote count for president (which did say Gore had a majority votes, but Bush had a majority in the Electoral College)? Or just the number of folks showing up at the protest? Because, well, don’t you have some other message you could have used the poster, ink and gentle curse word for?