$3.5 Million To Change The Course Of American History?
Saturday, February 10th, 2007One little flash drive, 3.5 million little bills, 300 million lives in the balance:
“IT,” or the letters “I” and “T,” pronounced like the word “It,” are the initials of the title of an illustrated digital document stored on the micro flash drive pictured above and below. The 202-page, single-spaced report presents a collection of fact-based verifiable research that details the evidence for a major newly discovered national political-religious controversy in the United States. As an established author, instead of giving this discovery away for free, I have decided to offer the news story rights and all other rights to any interested global news organization, media company, religious organization, institutional collector of religious material, or private collector of religious material. Besides the general public, Christianity, Judaism, and Islam would have an interest in this information.Why $3.5 million?…
because politics and religion are involved; specifically, the discovered placement of hidden irreverent religious information on a very serious scale, the possible loss of religious-based political supporters in the U.S. in the millions for those responsible is another matter that would be the subject of national discussion in the United States. I also need to state that if it were to be claimed or argued that what has been discovered is not an intentionally hidden religious “inside joke” for the amusement of and originated by the hands of a small number of American political men of the same party, then millions of believers in Christianity, Judaism, and Islam around the world would consider this discovery carefully as a possible miracle. These are the three choices: political-religious inside joke, super-extraordinary set of coincidences (unlikely), or miracle.
do understand that US $3.5 million is subject to over 35% in income and related taxes. If this discovery had already been made public, the resulting controversy would have been discussed in every newspaper, news magazine, and news radio and television news program in America and most of the rest of the world. As for the concept of selling a news story, I did some research and here is a quote I found online by American journalist-author Bill O’Reilly that appeared in the July/August 1994 issue of Columbia Journalism Review in an article titled “Buying News,” in which he commented about the daily syndicated television news series, Inside Edition, that he was host of at the time, sometimes paying for stories:
“The networks are making millions off news programs. Why shouldn’t the common man participate in that? It’s capitalism at its finest.”
Well, sure. But the “common man” needs to give someone a bit more than a potential conspiracy theory tract to cash in on that.
Granted, this is the same guy that wrote the “Model-Actor’s Dictionary”. Though, I believe it should be “Actor/Model” because then the Slashie would mean more. Just ask Fabio. A “Supergirl” screenplay, telekinesis research, gosh, this guy looks like a modern day renaissance man!
Call me a skeptic, but I just can’t buy into this. Or maybe it’s just because I’m broke. Hopefully some eccentric billionare with a taste for the crazy buys it so we can all get off the edge of our seats and find out the fate of the world.
(h/t Boing Boing which also has worthwhile comments from John Parman)












