War sparks dueling rallies

Simultaneous rallies for war and peace occur just blocks from each other in Fredericksburg last night.

Citizens, blocks apart, air opinions on conflict

The message from the throng gathered yesterday evening at a rally to support American troops and leaders was direct and simple.

“The time for debate is over,” Del. Mark Cole, a Spotsylvania Republican, told about five dozen rally-goers at the Religious Freedom Monument on Fredericksburg’s Washington Avenue. “The decision has been made. Once the first bullet has been fired, you can’t show support for the troops by trying to undermine leaders on the home front.”

At the same time, not far away in Hurkamp Park on William Street, people on the other side of the issue rallied to express their viewpoint.

Some 25 people gathered for a candlelight vigil touted as being pro-military but antiwar.

Both rallies came one day after the number of casualties in the allies’ campaign against Iraqi President Saddam Hussein reached double digits.

At the Washington Avenue monument, about five dozen people turned out. Carrying signs and U.S. flags, they wore yellow ribbons to indicate their support for American troops in the Middle East and to rally behind President Bush.

The crowd included GOP leaders such as Cole, Shaun Kenney, chairman of the the Fredericksburg Republican Committee; former Stafford County Supervisor Ken Mitchell; and John Morris, chair of the Mary Washington College Republicans. About two dozen other College Republicans came, too.

Susan Spears, vice chairman of the Fredericksburg Democratic Committee, brought her dog Eddie, clad in a Stars-and-Stripes bandanna, to rally alongside those who are normally her political opponents.

“I’m not going to change parties or anything like that,” Spears said. “I just don’t think this should be a partisan issue. I think we should be united in a time of war behind our president and our troops.”

Many of those who attended said they rallied in the hope that the troops would learn that many people in Fredericksburg are behind them, the rally a few blocks away with the opposite message not withstanding.

“Those folks in Hurkamp Park have a right to be there,” Kenney said. “I respect that. But they must understand there are worse things in this life than war.”

“The suffering under Saddam’s regime,” for one, Kenney said.

A few blocks to the northeast, antiwar protesters assembled for their vigil–an event organized after members of the Fredericksburg Area Coalition for Peace heard about the other rally.

“We’re basically just coming together to mourn the lives that have been lost so far,” organizer Katarina Fletcher, a 27-year-old Fredericksburg resident, said before the vigil.

Participants ranged from Fletcher’s baby son, Nesta, to local residents who remembered protests from their youth.

Judith Parker, an associate professor of English and linguistics at Mary Washington College, recalled peace gatherings of yesteryear attended by famous protesters like the late poet Allen Ginsberg.

A few minutes later, as if on cue, a car drove by, Grateful Dead music blaring from its stereo.

The vigil’s participants sat in a circle, candles in front of them, and sipped apple cider while voicing their thoughts about the campaign in Iraq for nearly an hour.

Tony Sanchez said loving one’s country doesn’t mean you have to support all of its policies. That’s a lesson he wanted to show his 7-year-old daughter Dominique, whom he brought to the event.

“I love you, United States, but what you’re doing is wrong,” said Sanchez, who lives in Fredericksburg.

Andrew Sentipal, a Stafford High School senior, embraced his girlfriend, Christine Haines, as others shared their views.

When it was his turn, he said, “Diplomacy wasn’t exhausted before we went to war.”

Others said they couldn’t understand how military action against a country is supposed to liberate it.

But a pink sign on display at the vigil may have summed up participants’ feelings best.

It said, in black block letters, “Stop the War.”

Shaun was sick over the weekend but suddenly cured in time for the rally. It’s a miracle! (Just bustin’ yer balls, Shaun.)

The anti-war rally was in response to the pro-war demonstration and seems to have been hastily arranged, which may account for the small numbers. A larger rally this Saturday may have more folks. But I wouldn’t be surprized if it didn’t.

Is anyone else noticing the following trend? In large cities you have thousands of anti-war demonstrators showing up and only a few hundred supporting the war while in smaller cities there would be a couple hundred folks for the war and only a small group against. Now, it’s probably not that urbanites are more against the war, but that people are more willing to not only travel to larger cities to get their message heard but that knowing these rallies will be larger, a larger variety of groups show up to shout their various messages. The small town anti-war demonstrators are the ones who actually are focusing on their opposition to the war as opposed to the ANSWER rallies with eighteen groups that are protesting capitalism, the drug war, ‘framed’ cop killers, the IMF and a few who are actually against war specifically.

People scream “Look at these crowds, the majority of America is against you, Mister Bush!” but, really, look at the crowds in the smaller towns. There are MORE smaller towns than large cities, more of those towns have larger groups SUPPORTING the President and the smaller town rallies are with the residents of that town as opposed to the large city pulling a crowd of 50,000 from six states.

Just an observation.

The Pro-War Movement Grows! Yeah, all you anti-war folks with your Hollywood suporters, watch out. Corey Haim is on the side of Bush!

Cheers on the Tigris for one that got away

One of the first who said he saw Baghdad anti-aircraft gunners hit the British aircraft on Sunday was 50-something Mohammed Abdul Salkah. Pointing to the west, he said: “I saw the attack – the plane went that way and the pilot jumped into the river. I saw the soldiers find his parachute and helmet.”

At first the searchers tried to smoke the pilot out – dousing the rushes in litres of petrol, which they ignited. When that did not work they called in the Iraqi equivalent of navy SEALs – three overweight men in a dinghy, who wore swimmers and were obliged to share the one half-length wetsuit.

When they failed, troops with sickles stomped through the rushes and whenever they suspected they had the pilot cornered, more than 100 men with Kalashnikovs and pistols opened fire, pouring thousands of rounds into the undergrowth.

Every now and again a shout would go up and the crowd would surge along the river bank, tumbling into the rushes before it was pushed back. “Jibo, jibo”, they yelled, or “Bring him, bring him.”

The exercise had a vital commercial element – Saddam Hussein pays any Iraqi gunner who downs an enemy aircraft the equivalent of $US50,000 ($85,000). Those who bring him a live pilot get $US50,000 and, if the pilot is dead, the reward slips to $US25,000.

At times the crowd broke into pro-Saddam chants, but one bearded Iraqi held back, saying: “This is bad. I’m a pilot and I hate to see another pilot treated this way.”

Soon after that exchange I was joined by an Iraqi mute who explained his view in sign language. At first he said that he wanted to go into the rushes, pull the pilot out, shake him by the shoulders and punch him in the nose.

But then the mute thought about it and, in elaborate gestures, showed that he was capable of a more personal, more humane reaction.

Pointing at his brain to suggest intelligence, he said that the pilot would be hiding underwater; that he might be able to swim to the middle of the river and drift downstream to safety. This would be good, he said with a thumbs-up gesture.

As sunset approached, he circled his watch with a finger to indicate the onset of darkness in an hour; he pinched his nose and used arm movements to demonstrate underwater swimming, away from the rushes; and he smiled a smile of great satisfaction.

Just before dark there was wild cheering as the crowd saw a reed, standing vertically as it floated downstream. Two soldiers stripped off and swam towards it; but as they neared it the Kalashnikovs opened up again.

They scarpered … and the reed got away.

Michael Moore booed as he slams Iraq war at Oscars

Famed US documentary maker Michael Moore used his win of an Oscar to launch a violent attack on US President George W. Bush and war in Iraq amid loud boos from the audience.

“We live in fictitious times,” he said when picking up the award for best documentary for his anti-gun film “Bowling for Columbine.”

“We live in a time with fictitious election results that elect fictitious presidents. We live in a time when we have a man sending us to war for fictitious reasons.

“We are against this war Mr Bush. Shame on you. Shame on you!,” he said to loud boos from an audience of 3,500 including most of Hollywood’s top stars.

Actually, he was initially cheered with his protest and then the boos began, but it seemed half and half, really. Oh well, if you didn’t expect this you obviously don’t know who Michael Moore is.

1441 MORE: Michael Moore criticizes U.S. war in Iraq in Oscar speech

A standing ovation and a handful of jeers from Hollywood’s elite greeted filmmaker Michael Moore when he criticized President Bush and the U.S.-led war in Iraq during his acceptance speech Sunday after winning the documentary feature Oscar for “Bowling for Columbine.”

“We live in fictitious times. We live in the time where we have fictitious election results that elect a fictitious president. We live in a time where we have a man who’s sending us to war for fictitious reasons, whether it’s the fiction of duct tape or the fiction of orange alerts,” Moore said.

Applause gave way to some boos, as the orchestra began to play the filmmaker off the stage.

“We are against this war, Mr. Bush. Shame on you, Mr. Bush. Shame on you,” Moore shouted, surrounded onstage by his fellow nominees in a show of solidarity.

“It was so sweet backstage, the teamsters are helping Michael Moore into the trunk of his limo,” host Steve Martin joked later.

Here’s his acceptance speech.

My, people are jumping to conclusions. A Muslum American soldier is being held and questioned in yesterday’s attack on officers of the 101st Airborne. Some folks are already saying this is part of a larger plot. Nevermind that CNN reported that the man was said to have been reprimanded for insubordination recently. Military criminal investigators said the suspect was recently reprimanded for insubordination and was told he would stay behind when his unit left camp for Iraq, Time reporter Jim Lacey said. That certainly didn’t play a role.

Look, war is hell, people, and sometimes soldiers snap. I would be surprized if this was anything more than just a soldier under a hell of a lot of stress and pressure snapping and taking it out on his officers. The same officers who told him he would not be going into battle. Can you imagine being sent to the Gulf for months, training, working, sweating, laboring only to be told that you will be left behind? Hell, imagine being in the 101st Airborne Division and told that! SNAP!

I’m not even going to address the bigotry behind some comments.

“Shame, Shame, Shame”

From the Washington Post

Shouts of ‘Shame, Shame, Shame’

For a few tense moments at Vermont Avenue and K Street NW this morning, police surrounded a group of about 100 protesters, boxing them in in front of the plate glass windows of Citibank. There was a shattering sound as protesters broke a window at the bank. Some of the protesters tossed smoke bombs on the sidewalk, yelling, “Our streets! Our streets!”

Police supervisors shouted instructions to the baton-wielding officers, “Start the arrest process. Cuff ’em.” The officers began to lead protesters one by one into waiting Metrobuses. For the most part, they went quietly, the crowd behind yelling, “Shame, shame, shame.”

Alexander Berkman, 26, of Richmond, Va., watched from outside the protest group, wondering why the police were also shoving spectators and members of the media.

“The police are pushing reporters out of the way,” said Berkman, an organizer with the Richmond Coalition for a Living Wage. “One hit a person in the throat with his baton. These are people simply observing; they’re not here in any protest capacity.”

Just as quickly, it seemed, things calmed down as the arrests continued and the crowd of spectators grew. One protester and spectator on K Street got into a rather heated exchange.

“You think you’re the only person who works!” said the young male protester, wearing a knit cap and a bandana tied around his mouth.

“Peaceful demonstration is fine, but if people can’t get to their jobs, it’s disruptive,” said Shane Deithorn, 38, a construction superintendent from Mt. Airy, Md., who works across the street. “They should lock them all up.”

–Sue Anne Pressley, 8:42 a.m.

For starters, I didn’t hear any shouts of “Shame, Shame, Shame.” Must have been on the other side of the crowd. And, yes, the police were pushing reporters away, but that didn’t start until the smoke bombs started, which I give the police props for pushing us away on. Who the hell knew what that was. There were people choking and running, many thought it was tear gas, the police pushed everyone away to clear the area as well as give them room to maneuver so no one got hurt. Yea, police, boo, protesters.

55 arrested at Citibank site

Police have arrested 55 protesters and charged them with rioting after demonstrators smashed several windows at the Citibank offices at Vermont and K streets NW, D.C. Police Chief Charles Ramsey said this morning.

–David Fahrenthold, 8:04 a.m.

Damn right, arrest them. CitiBank borded up all of their windows AFTER this happened. Better late than never, I guess.

Windows smashed at Citibank

Several hundred protesters have moved to the intersection of Vermont and K streets NW where they smashed several windows at the Citibank offices at the intersection. Traffic is snarled in that part of the city. There are also reports of a smoke-bomb type device being tossed at police, who have made some arrests at the scene.

–Manny Fernandez, 7:57 a.m.

Snarled traffic? Well, I wasn’t there until 8:10 and there was NO traffic. Police did a great job redirecting folks. Smoke bombs were there, they sucked, but were pretty damn stupid on the protesters’ part. I mean, Christ, people, what the hell are you doing throwing things that smoke at police? Might as well star shooting cap guns at them. Sigh.

Terrorism?

While I will not rule it out, I can’t not bring myself to believe that these sniper attacks are a terrorist plot. I’m sorry. It’s too slow, it’s too low key. We’d have seen attacks like the one in Bali if the terrorists wanted to get at us here. No, this is a domestic nutcase.

The Village Idiot inspired this brief rant.

Then again, something like this isn’t very reassuring: U.S. senators warned of al Qaeda snipers on golf courses. So, wait, snipers are after our Senators? And there wasn’t a general warning to the public? Shouldn’t everyone be on the look out?

Terrorist One: “Hey, does that guy look like a senator to you?”

Terrorist Two: “Um…. Yes?”

Terrorist One: “Good enough for me!”

Random Person: “Oh my God, someone shot Tiger Woods!”

Sorry, probably not worth joking over, but I felt the need.

You know, I’m really digging Jerry Brito’s blog.

Got them digits

I think Milli Vanilli said it best when they said, “Baby, don’t you lose my number”… Sniper hooks police up with some digits, Cheif Moose eagerly waiting by phone. Or something like that. It seems the sniper may have left another message. I certainly don’t hope this isn’t just a case of someone losing a number and the police finding it and thinking it’s something it isn’t. I mean, some guy’s probably tearing through his house for some hot chick’s number while the police are waiting by the pay phone the number is too, hoping that it’s a clue. God, I hope they catch this son of a bitch soon.

BeltwaySniperForum.com

BeltwaySniperForum.com I’ve realized the problem I’m having with these kind of sites. It’s their forums. Now, the person making these sites might be making them for good intentions, you know, to keep the public informed, as a tribute to the victims, as a support list for those who are stressed out by these events. But sooner or later these sites are over run by people who are just their for a soap box for their theories about who’s responsible and why. Terrorism, government plot, one person, eight people, aliens, these sites will attract these crack pots if they haven’t already so it’s either that these theories are there or they’re coming and I’m very leary of those kinds of things. And I’m sure it’s very frustrating for the webmaster of these sites as well as most of them do not feel the same way as those that will take over their boards. But that is the nature of the beast we all call the Web.

Too close to home

Meryl Yourish on the recent sniper related shooting. This is interesting to me because she’s currently in Richmond and now she feels at risk. I mean, I’m sure she did before, but this is closer to home for her and probably all of Richmond.

But what I’m really finding interesting is Fredericksburg’s place in Virginia in all of this. I mean, I’ve lived here pretty much all my life and Fredericksburg has always been in some sort of limbo as to where it is. It’s smack dab between Washington DC and Richmond, Virginia. Not quite northern Virginia, not quite central. Not quite a suburb of DC and certainly not a suburb of Richmond.

But Fredericksburg is the line, more or less. Go ten minutes north, you’re in northern Virginia and anything happening there is reflected in DC in some manner. Go ten minutes south, you’re in central Virginia and Richmond is your metro area. Just weird how it reflects in the media and people’s reactions to these events.

I have no idea what I’m trying to say.

Ashland is damn close, though. Not as close as the Exxon around the corner or the Michaels on the other side of town, but still.

Sniper shooting in Ashland?

Sniper shooting in Ashland, VA? All signs point to yes, but they can’t be sure until they get ballistics testing, if they can even get the bullet out of the guy. And I know this area, I go by it a few times a year for various reasons.

Why would the sniper shoot in Ashland?

No one’s looking for him down there.

This would also explain the five day lull, he was casing a new location to do a shooting. He’s unfamiliar with Ashland, or, was and it took time for him to get used to it. Now he’ll move somewhere else or he’ll get gutsy and head back towards the beltway. Sigh.

Also, if you look in TIME magazine this week with their article about the sniper killer they have a map of the area and his shootings. They mixed up the two in the Fredericksburg area, the ones labled 8 and 11. The earlier shooting was further north, the later one was south. Minor thing that should have been caught in editing, but oh well.